Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Si sale bien Ten Shin creo que quiere comprar participaciones del Megaclub mas grande de Europa que abren hoy en la Jonquera - Girona.

Tu dale pistas !!!! que como siga así se funde la pasta de Selfbank en el primer viaje y luego busca culpables :)

Después del batacazo de ayer, ahora 37.50$ +4.9%

Algo es algo.

Y yo que quiero comprar mi ultimo paquete y no me dejan (volumen seco como una mojama) ¿porque será?

Si tienes tanta confianza pon a comprar altito que ya verás como hay volumen... Y además, las haces subir.

jejeje yo quiero esperar al hearing de mañana a ver que ocurre.
Pienso que el lunes ya estaré dentro a esperar acontecimientos.

Solo son 1000 P de volumen, seguro que es Simpson comprando y calentando motores para animar.

In the likely event that Mr. Hochberg's examination find's something damaging to the debtors POR, which Rosen has committed everything to, what is his strategy? My guess is that he will demand the vote for his POR go forward not withstanding. He must know that something will turn up in the examiner''s report but as discussed on the board here will the examiner's report effect any class votes - probably not. So, the question seems to be, in the event of a favorable examiner's report are there enough votes to turn away the debtors juggernaut? My guess is Rosen thinks he has the votes no matter what and Sussman thinks he can stop the juggernaut.

Which bings to Mr. Sussman's strategy. Since the EC has filed no objection to the DS approval, not even on the DS's merits or lack thereof, plus argued meekly against the DS approval at this week's approval hearing, it is obvious Sussman must have a strategy to stop the debtor's DS/POR juggernaut. Given the EC's strategy to not strongly object to the debtor's DS approval it appears likely that Sussman plans to rely heavily on the Examiner's report to stop the POR. The question seems to be does Sussman believe he will have enough votes to stop the POR if the report is favorable for equity? The answer does not appear to be clear and would appreciate any comments. Also, if EC does not have the votes possibly then will Sussman rely on a decision from the court to stop the debtor's POR even though Rosen will strrongly argue that his POR, given an approved DS, is procedurely entitled to a vote for which of course he feels he has the votes to pass regardless of the examiner's findings. TIA.

Without looking up the exact POR procedures, I believe after the vote, the POR has to go through the UST and then has to have the Judge's final approval after the Confirmation proceedings.

Hence, her constant reminder to save the arguments for the Confirmation. With strong hard evidence from the Examiner for Susman and Solomon to use for valuation, I don't believe the Judge would risk her career to save Rosen's backside and approve his POR.