Staging ::: VER CORREOS
Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
1.741 / 3.346
#13921

Los 3500 accionistas YA estan organizados

www.wamuequityrights.com para tu información.
Creamos el EC
Dotamos de Due Dilligence a nuestros abogados.
Enviamos miles de cartas de apoyo n un Binder para la Junta de accionistas y...

Cuando llegue el día votaremos en masa. Eso unido al billón de acciones falsas que existe
por los números publicados es lo que tiene tan nerviosos a Weil y Alvarez & Marshall (actual BOD), saben que si hay Voto la cosa pinta fea para ellos.

Paciencia mi pequeño saltamontes, los accionistas estamos a golpe de email para hacer lo que haga falta!!!

Como reemplazaer a la actual Junta Directiva:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=en&tl=es&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwamuequityrights.org%2F

#13922

Re: Los 3500 accionistas YA estan organizados

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=en&tl=es&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwamuequityrights.org%2F

Ese gran matiz encontrado por un simple accionista metido a sabueso.

Completo 07 de abril 2010:
Accionista Acumulación: Nuestra acumulación se presentó en la corte de bancarrota el 7 de abril de 2010. Los accionistas de todo el mundo decidieron participar mediante la presentación de una Carta de Autorización. Más de 3.500 accionistas añadido su nombre en favor de la Equidad de la acción de la Comisión para obligar a WMI para celebrar anual de accionistas de una reunión con el fin de elegir a un nuevo Consejo de Administración. Esta fue una respuesta sorprendente habida cuenta de que teníamos sólo cinco días para recoger las cartas.¡Gracias a todos los que prestaron su apoyo!

#13923

Re: Los 3500 accionistas YA estan organizados

Simpson si puedes postear la fuente del billon de acciones falsas o sea MIL MILLONES, que se dice pronto. No se si sabes que la SEC regula las acciones americanas para permitir que pueda cometerse semejanse salvajada incluso en Pink Sheets. Por cierto tu nueva frase de final de posts te va a huevo con tu compra de Wamus Jaja "No existen los gurus ni los profetas de la Bolsa, sólo visionarios y soñadores"

#13924

-

-

#13925

Bofan valuation is not correct

Her valuation is based on replacement value of the bank which was seized illeglly. WEil as I said many times , neglected to suye for illegal seizure( probably because he was conflicted) and therefore, this defense is time barred unless, we care to bring it all the way to the supreme court and have them rule that most of the Firrea protective laws are unconstitutional based on our rights to due process.
So now we have to calculate the value of a bank that was legally seized. FDIC felt WMB was close to not being able to pay its obligations and therefore seized it premptively. They are allowed to do this. NOw what is the vlue os the ban, when the nation is in a financial crisis, much less than the replacement value. The FDIC could have waited but them perhaps things could have gotten worse. They did not knowFDIC insurance would be increased and tarp woould be passed. If we can prove they knew this or should have known this , then our case is stronger and we are entitled to a higher valuation.
THe fraudulent conveyence is a good claim, but you can not collect from WMBm you need court to rule JPM as ultimate transferee of the bank assets is responsible. I do not know what the court might rule on this point. Also FDIC is claiming reverse fraudulent transfers. WMB gave dividends to WMI and want the money back. THe tax refunds, acccoring to Firrea might belong the the FDIC. THe 4 billion deposit while I believe it is ours can be challaged as a reverse fraudulent transfer as maybe it was taken from loans give to WMB.??? The trade markets beloned to WMI and FDIC has to pay for them. But JPM might says I used them for the transition and do not want to keep them. Their value might be less than we hope. Project West is interesting, but can we prove securities fraud?? I know that JP violated the non compete, but he can say once bank was seized, the damage was done and he was hte highest bidder so he helped us by violating the agreement.
May analysis, is we are making a lot of noise and threats, if we can settle for $1.00-#.00 for the common, we should takeit fast. I worry that the problem is that JPM is offiering zero for the commo and maybe a hundred dollars for the preferred. I love Bopfan as she has tried to help us since the beginning, but this case with Firrea laws is more complcated. WE have to forget about Bopfan's $80.00 valuations. let us get a settlement if we can for anything for the common shareholder.

#13926

Re: Bofan valuation is not correct

¿Pedes poner el enlace, Emili?

#13927

Re: Bofan valuation is not correct

http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_W/threadview?m=te&bn=86316&tid=528187&mid=528187&tof=17&frt=2#528187

Fedoemili: La frase es de alguien muy sabio llamado Kostolany. ¿porqué te has quedado callado con lo de los 3500 accionistas? o es que no sabias de que iba el Joinder de Wamuequityrights.com
Pienso que tu del caso no sabes ni de la misa la mitad y tu único proposito ya está claro para los presentes por lo que al igual que le dije a tu alter ego esta es la ultima vez que te respondo por alusiones. Sigo con mis vacaciones :) :) :)

#13928

Re: Bofan valuation is not correct

Simpsonemili, ya imaginaba que la frase no era de tu creación, era de esperar. Lo de la web de los accionistas ya lo sigo y se lo de los 3500 accionistas y las cartas de apoyo, todo esto no garantiza una votacion de accionistas por mayoría. No puedo estar contestando cada post tuyo o ¿No posteo bastante?