Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Mañana cerraremos por encima de 0,25.

! por la Gloria de mi Madre !

Mr. Simpson, el Secreto está en la masa !!!!

Ostiassssssss, que se me vaaaaaaaaaaa...............

Se te fue hace mucho... lee lo del examiner y veras los comentarios de Susman al respecto.

Veo que aun te pica..rasca rasca a ver si encuentras algo :)
Yo no he logrado el 0.25 nos quedamos a 3.5 c...q se le va a hacer...

No desesperes que todo llega

Mr. que pasa , pero que majo eres, que comentarios de Susman

I have not known this fact in the past 21months....but on page 90/193 of Susman's Motion today for Examiner....bottom of page states that " Five days before the failure, Washington Mutual executives expected a $10bil offer from Banco Santander for a 80% stake""

Jamie spoke with the CEO of Banco Santander and devulged confidental information and changed their minds??? Jamie will be in the hot seat when all this comes out through Examiner's report.....

http://www.thestreet.com/story/10679775/did-dimon-breach-wamu-agreement.html

Ahora ya solo te hace falta entenderlo!!!

Ya solo falta que llmaen a declarar a botin con su ingles de principe gitano seria para mearse de risa

By Peg Brickley
Of DOW JONES DAILY BANKRUPTCY REVIEW

Shareholders of Washington Mutual Inc. (WAMUQ) Tuesday renewed demands that
an outsider be appointed to probe the settlement at the heart of the
bank-holding company's Chapter 11 plan.

The former parent of Washington Mutual Bank, or WaMu, wants to exit its
Chapter 11 plan by way of a deal with regulators who seized the troubled thrift
and with J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM), which bought WaMu.

Some shareholders and some creditors have alleged J.P. Morgan took unfair
advantage of WaMu's struggles in the fall of 2008 to get control of the company
at a bargain price.

J.P. Morgan, which paid $1.9 billion for WaMu, denies wrongdoing. According
to shareholders, "no governmental entity has opened any investigation regarding
[J.P. Morgan Chase's] conduct during its acquisition of [WaMu]."

Shareholders get nothing if the settlement goes through. The committee that
represents them in Washington Mutual's bankruptcy case called earlier this year
for an examiner to investigate WaMu's seizure and sale.

They lost. Last week, however, Judge Mary Walrath said she was having second
thoughts, in part because of stone-walling by Washington Mutual when it came to
explaining to shareholders the reasons for the deal.

Lawyers for shareholders say, from what they've seen, Washington Mutual
didn't even bother to gather up the results of other investigations into WaMu's
collapse before coming to terms with regulators and J.P. Morgan.

Washington Mutual said attorney-work product shields its thinking from
shareholder prying and defended the settlement as the quickest way out of a
morass of legal trouble caused by the seizure.

At a hearing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Del., Walrath said
the company should not be treating its shareholders like adversaries.

In Tuesday's court filing, shareholders said appointment of an examiner would
be the least contentious, most efficient means of testing the validity of
Washington Mutual's proposed settlement.

(Dow Jones Daily Bankruptcy Review covers news about distressed companies and
those under bankruptcy protection.)

-By Peg Brickley, Dow Jones Daily Bankruptcy Review; 302-521-2266 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 302-521-2266 end_of_the_skype_highlighting;
[email protected]