Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Sois 220 pero la empresa la comanda MW , y si quiere daros por el ano lo hará aunque no te guste, que en tu caso puede que hasta disfrutes.
De momento desde que se creo la empresa apenas han ganado nada las acciones, lo que resulta altamente nocivo para los bolsillos de los que te siguieron teniendo en consideración que la bolsa americana esta en máximos y tus pillados llevan lastrando unas perdidas enormes.
En fin que eres el pupas de Rankia y un peligro para cualquier bolsillo inversor.
Un placer hacer todo lo contrario que recomiendas.

Pues compralo todo ahora que está baratito :) :) :) y no te olvides de saludar para decir que estas vivo por Alaska no te vaya a devorar un Oso Polar jajajaja

Perdon que vas a comprar si aun estas esperando que te paguen algo para pegarte el piro para siempre... mientras Jamie Dimon es sacudido por la Obama Admin... Como me gusta esta saga de Greed & Corruption.

Simpson eres un Percebe, por si no lo sabes.

MONEY MONEY MONEY!! 18 banks sued by the U.S. to recoup $200.5 billion spent on mortgage-backed securities bought by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

1. Ally Financial Inc. f/k/a GMAC, LLC ($6 billion)
2. Bank of America Corporation ($6 billion)
3. Barclays Bank PLC ($4.9 billion)
4. Citigroup, Inc. ($3.5 billion)
5. Countrywide Financial Corporation ($26.6 billion)
6. Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc.($14.1 billion)
7. Deutsche Bank AG ($14.2 billion)
8. First Horizon National Corporatio ($883 million)
9. General Electric Company ($549 million)
10. Goldman Sachs & Co.($11.1 billion)
11. HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. ($6.2 billion)
12. JPMorgan Chase & Co.($33 billion)
13. Merrill Lynch & Co. / First Franklin Financial Corp. ($24.8 billion)
14. Morgan Stanley ($10.6 billion)
15. Nomura Holding America Inc.($2 billion)
16. Th"e Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC($30.4 billion)
17. Société Général($1.3 billion)
18. UBS, Swiss Bank, ($4.5 billion)
Mucha guita, el chacal de Sussman Godfrey estara en la salsa? nos tocara alguito? que opinas Besugo

Banco de America y JPM a la banca rota? a mi parecer Goldman Sachs es el causante de las Hipotecas Basura y esta pasando piola, esos judios hijos de p son carajo

NY Times is starting to dig up some old skeletons:
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/10/21/considering-the-fairness-of-jpmorgans-deal/
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/10/21/morning-agenda-a-crucial-call-from-jpmorgans-chief/
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/u-s-deal-with-jpmorgan-spurred-by-a-phone-call/?nl=business&emc=edit_dlbkam_20131021
Some excerpts:

- The big question is whether Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual have produced profits to offset the proportion of the litigation expenses that stem from both entities. JPMorgan stopped saying how much it expected each entity to make soon after it bought them. But if JPMorgan’s early profit estimates are used, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual may have contributed $16 billion in net income since the end of 2008.”
- Even now, a significant obstacle stands in the way of a deal: whether JPMorgan will admit to all of the improper actions cited by the Justice Department…
- In addition to the civil and criminal cases in Sacramento, which focused on the bank’s own mortgage securities, other cases zeroed in on securities sold by Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. …prosecutors in Pennsylvania were scrutinizing deals from Washington Mutual and New York’s attorney general had already filed a lawsuit involving Bear Stearns.
---
- ‘It was not until Friday that JPMorgan backed down from its demand that the criminal case go away. Rather than resolve that case now, JPMorgan decided to let it play out. One person close to the bank noted that bank lawyers were skeptical it would actually produce charges. If criminal charges arise, it could mean additional fines and a deal that requires an independent monitor to keep an eye on the bank.
- …Little suggests that JPMorgan bought Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual against its will. It was avidly watching both in 2008, hoping to snatch them up at low prices. Mr. Paulson appeared to acknowledge JPMorgan’s benefit from the acquisitions in the interview earlier this month. “I’m not saying these things weren’t in JPMorgan’s interest,” he said. “I assume they were.” WHY IS PAULSON SAYING THIS NOW?

Tu si que has montado una buena trama dejando una sangría de perdidas espeluznante.

Cada post tuyo es más divertido no te haces a la idea de lo que me haces reír.
No pares que esto es como el camarote de Groucho Marx jajajaja