Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

Buenas! Jesús, sabes porque WAMKP.PK no están comerciandose en la bolsa?

Las WAMKQ se están comercializando. Todas las emisiones deberían terminar en Q y no en P

Dias tranquilos, poco volumen, y al menos es UP : D

esta para dormir una siesta!!

Despertadme el 23 Noviembre si es que Walrath no habla antes... :)
Ya queda menos.

Que Walrath hable antes, lo descarto, lleva haciendose la remolona desde abril-mayo. Y lo del 23 de noviembre si en los dias previos no tenemos subidas con volumenes cercanos a los 100millones de acciones, a mi mejor el 23 ni me desperteis, ya despertarme el año que viene ;). Eso sí como tengamos subidones los dias previos, puede ser que el 23 se lie gorda.

Este texto esta extraido del 10-Q de JPM.
Una cosa está clara... estan avisando a los inversores de los riesgos que se avecinan...hasta ahora NUNCA habian hablado así... tic tac.

http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/ONE/747772249x0xS950123-09-60099/19617/filing.pdf

Page 186

Washington Mutual Litigation. On September 4, 2009, in the previously disclosed action commenced by WMI against the FDIC in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (the “District Court Action”), JPMorgan Chase answered the FDIC’s counterclaims, which named JPMorgan Chase as a party, and asserted its own cross claims and counterclaims. On October 5, 2009, the District Court granted JPMorgan Chase’s motion to intervene as a defendant with respect to the original complaint filed by WMI.

On August 24, 2009, in JPMorgan Chase’s adversary proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Case”), seeking a determination that JPMorgan Chase has legal title to and beneficial ownership in the Washington Mutual assets in dispute, the Bankruptcy Court denied JPMorgan Chase’s motion to dismiss counterclaims brought by WMI and its wholly-owned subsidiary, WMI Investment Corp. (together, the “Debtors”). On September 21, 2009, JPMorgan Chase answered Debtors’ counterclaims.

As previously disclosed, in the Bankruptcy Case, Debtors moved in May 2009 for summary judgment in the adversary proceeding against JPMorgan Chase in which the Debtors seek turnover of approximately $4 billion in purported deposit funds. That motion has been fully briefed and argued, but no decision has been issued by the Bankruptcy Court.

"However, in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, actions and investigations, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed the reserves currently accrued by the Firm; as a result, the outcome of a particular matter may be material to JPMorgan Chase’s operating results for a particular period, depending on, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of JPMorgan Chase’s income for that period"

Jesus Mejias eres un puto crack.A seguir comprando,para multiplicarlo.

En principio nada que no sepan ya los accionistas de JPM. Aunque eso si, hay varias cosas que se desprenden del último párrafo:
- La resolución judicial está muy próxima.
- "the size of the loss or liability imposed"...ASUMEN que va a haber responsabilidad jurídica.
- "there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not significantly exceed..." Desconozco como funciona el sistema contable en USA pero imagino que tendrán en cuenta las NIIC como en Europa, con lo cual los 4B ya están provisionados como "Grandes Responsabilidades" con cargo a Reservas del 2008 y 2009. Con lo cual al mencionar los cargos a ingresos del ejercicio intuyen que la responsabilidad será superior...

Es sólo una interpretación. Igual me equivoco.

Sldos.