Staging ::: VER CORREOS
Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
1.326 / 3.346
#10601

Re: Más documentos.

Hola Adruna. Como estamos en Chapter 11 debemos salir con un POR que es la forma en que la empresa encarará su futuro. Pero la empresa sigue, tal como está o de otra forma. Este juicio es un puente entre la anterior empresa y la futura, por eso digo que esto seguirá más allá de junio. Aunque el POR fuera firmado (Dios no lo quiera) el meeting del 11 de junio tiene sentido, ya que la empresa seguirá con otro BOD. Con relación relación al tema de los abogados, concuerdo con vos que esto no transmite optimismo a los seguidores del tema, pero es lo que tenemos...

#10602

Re: Más documentos.

Gracias Lulou, clarisima tu explicacion.
Esa era la parte que no terminaba de comprender.
Saludos y a ver como seguimos durante esta semana.

#10603

Re: Más documentos.

Pero que dices de los abogados, que no trasmite optimismo? Simpson ya ha comentado el porque de abogados distintos o no leis todos los post?

#10604

Re: Más documentos.

Leo todos!! Sólo me faltan los post de los abogados que transmitan optimismo por lo que hacen y no, por lo que NO hacen.

#10605

Re: Más documentos.

El tema es que se cancele el POR de una vez y no nos cancelen las comunes!!!!!!!!hay que tener esperanza en las mociones y en el rechazo del POR.

#10606

Re: Más documentos.

Lulou

Comparto la preocupación sobre el manejo que estan realizando los abogados. sin embargo pienso que por estrategia mientras no envien el por definitivo; los abogados del EC no deberián presentar las objeciones al mismo.

#10607

The WMB Bondholders did us a huge favor today

http://www.ghostofwamu.com/documents/09-01743/09-01743-0119.pdf

By filing this doc and reopening the wounds, we've got it all laid out in a fresh manner.

Remember how Weil got Discovery granted? They quoted this case.

Tell me what the odds are that the EC grabs this and says.. hey Judge, read this and tell us why we should give up these claims again? Unless you're dirty, you'll let this play out.

JPM even violated the confidentiality agreement they signed with the FDIC. This is hilarious.

"JPMC & Co. nevertheless freely disclosed the fact of FDIC’s involvement in the WMB bidding process to various third parties, including rating agencies, investors, and news media, in an effort to incite a bank run on Washington Mutual deposits and to drive down WMB’s credit
rating."

Whoops...

A September 11, 2008 email from a JPMC & Co. executive shows that JPMC &
Co. did not intend to deal directly or honestly with Washington Mutual, but instead planned to obtain WMB from an FDIC receivership, in which JPMC & Co. would “acquire assets and liabilities of West’s thrift subsidiaries but leave behind senior and unsecured debt with the FDIC ($15.2bn).”

"During this time, news media ran many stories that discussed Washington Mutual’s unsuccessful efforts to sell itself, the FDIC’s pending involvement in the sale of WMB assets, and other aspects of Washington Mutual’s financial health. Many of these news stories were sourced by
unnamed “investment bankers” close to the negotiations."

Whoops...

"In September of 2008, JPMC & Co. shared the confidential information with outside investors in order to arrange an $8 billion capital infusion that would enable JPMC Bank to maintain its Tier 1 capital ratio."

Whoops...

"JPMC’s & Co.’s disclosures, misstatements, and other misconduct fomented panic relative to WMB’s liquidity and viability. JPMC’s & Co.’s direct communications with credit rating agencies substantially caused such agencies to downgrade WMB’s credit rating."

Whoops...

"On Tuesday, September 23, 2008, according to a September 29, 2008 Wall Street Journal article, the FDIC purportedly sought bids from select bidders, including JPMC & Co., through its subsidiary, JPMC Bank, for the sale of WMB. Upon information and belief, an agreement had already been reached at this time between the FDIC and JPMC & Co. for the seizure and sale of WMB to JPMC & Co. In addition, the requirements for a “conforming bid” had been reached after previous negotiations between the FDIC and JPMC & Co."

Now that's a breech of the FDI ACT.

Whoops...

(D) DISPOSITION OF ASSETS.--In exercising any right, power, privilege, or authority described in subparagraph (A) regarding the sale or disposition of assets sold to the Corporation pursuant to paragraph (1), the Corporation shall conduct its operations in a manner which--

(i) maximizes the net present value return from the sale or disposition of such assets; (ii) minimizes the amount of any loss realized in the resolution of cases;

(iii) ensures adequate competition and fair and consistent treatment of offerors;
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/1000-1500.html#fdic1000sec.13d

#10608

Bid 0.07 - Ask 0.4209

Me imagino que es un error, pero alguien sabe como comprobarlo.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=11133

Washington Mutual (O (USOTC:WAMUQ)
Last Price (USD) $0.137
Change ▲ 0.0056 (4.26%)
Bid 0.07
Ask 0.4209
Volume 5,606,642
Days Range 0.1345 - 0.143
Last Trade 5/10/2010 4:02:14 PM