Staging ::: VER CORREOS
Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
1.247 / 3.346
#9969

Re: Con Steve Susman ...el tren se ha puesto en marcha

Esta semana no tienen que entrar un copon de mociones? Pues ya sería hora que la gente esta impaciente por ver la estratosfera.
Que ahora las acciones se mueven menos que un cuadro.

#9970

Re: Con Steve Susman ...el tren se ha puesto en marcha

Jeje. Creo que a algunos se os esta empezando a ir un poco la olla, de tanto comer Wamusitos:). Por cierto, hoy más goteo, para variar.

#9971

Re: Con Steve Susman ...el tren se ha puesto en marcha

Me has dejado deslumbrado con lo de comprar islas a 30.000€. Por curiosidad, ¿puedo saber dónde?

#9972

Re: Con Steve Susman ...el tren se ha puesto en marcha

Es que si no te ries, te mueres, hombre.

Y que mejor que diciendo boutardes.

Ahora si que me voy de todas, todas.

#9973

Re: Con Steve Susman ...el tren se ha puesto en marcha

En grecia jajajaja

#9974

Re: Con Steve Susman ...el tren se ha puesto en marcha

Si valen 56% la juerga seria tan terrorifica que nos quedariamos sin meretrices en españa(y ya es dificil con las que hay etiquetadas y no etiquetas que son las cras de vrdad jaja.no dejes el foro por nada del mundo.yo pienso que aunque no teengas un fisico apolineo si te matriculas de filosofia,suelen matricularse buenorras con la vida resuelta y con un porsche en la puerta de la facultad con tu sentido del humor y avidez aunque seas arrabal triufas fijo.

pd:estoy del puto goteo hasta los cojones,hay que tapar las goteras como sea

#9975

Was WMB solvent or insolvent when seized?

That is the only issue left regarding the seizure. Both the OTS and FDIC now have conceded publicly that WMB was adequately capitalized at the time that is was seized. Insufficient capital (due to bad loans) is the reason that failed banks are typically seized. So was WMB insolvent? Sheila Bair has publicly said that WMB had $4.4 billion in cash at the time that OTS seized it. She characterized that amount of cash as a 'dangerously' low level for a bank the size of WMB. Did WMB have access to other cash? WMB fsb (a subsidiary of WMB) apparently had $17 billion in cash at the time of the seizure that would have been available to WMB. Also, we know that WMI had $4 billion on deposit at WMB (the infamous money that JPM has been clinging on to) that they obviously could have made available to WMB with a couple of clicks of computer keys if they had needed to. And then there was the Federal Reserve discount window that we know was available to WMB. Sheila claimed that there was 'only' $10 billion available through the discount window at the time that WMB was seized but obviously that could have (and was) increased for a financial crisis. The WMB cash position is going to move to front and center on the issue desktop if the FDIC trial in DC District Court ever cranks up and it appears that Stephen Susman is absolutely correct that the value of the DC litigation is...an enormous asset of the estate. The litigation rights could (and should) be sold with the WMI name by the estate to allow the litigation to be completed and the FDIC damage to WMI to be punished and made an example of for the future.

#9976

Re: Was WMB solvent or insolvent when seized?

Pues el mercado no cree que nos vayan a indemnizar,porque nos estan dando a diestro y siniestro.