#1553
Re: Análisis de Bayer: ¿Buen momento para entrar en Bayer AG (BAY)?
No parecen malas noticias… y alejan la idea de pufo:
https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-06/pesticides_aas_agg_report_202106.pdf (la chicha en la pag.6)
https://www.google.es/amp/s/www.agribusinessglobal.com/agrochemicals/herbicides/several-eu-members-reaffirm-glyphosate-safety/%3famp
https://cen.acs.org/environment/pesticides/Glyphosate-carcinogenic-EU-report-confirms/99/i24
No me parece menor el detalle que este informe a la luz de la información aportada por las empresas del lobby del glifosato sea elaborado por los enemigos del glifosato (con Francia a la cabeza)
“Overall conclusion of the assessment by the AGG
The AGG has compared the outcome of the evaluation with the criteria for approval, as provided in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Based on the current assessment, the AGG considers that glyphosate does meet the approval criteria set in Regulation (EC) N° 1107/2009.
The AGG considers that authorisation in at least one Member State is expected to be possible for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance for at least one of the representative uses.
The AGG has also compared the outcome of the evaluation with the criteria for classification as provided in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on this comparison, AGG proposes that glyphosate fulfils the criteria for classification for Eye Damage Category 1 (H318) “causes serious eye damage” and Aquatic Chronic 2 (H411) “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”. This is the same as the present harmonised classification for glyphosate and no new classification is proposed.”
“Thereafter EFSA will organise a process of peer review among the experts of European Member States’ competent authorities. EFSA will then prepare a Conclusion, taking into account also the Opinion to be adopted by the ECHA Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) on classification. The EFSA Conclusion, foreseen for the second half of 2022, will be analysed by the European Commission which, based on the Conclusion, the dRAR and other factors legitimate to the matter, will prepare the discussion in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (SCoPAFF) in which risk managers of all Member States are represented20.
For the CLH-process, the Opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) is foreseen to be adopted in March 2022, but this could be later in June if new data become available that the RAC is required to review and to include in the assessment. EFSA will take this into account before finalising its conclusion. In case the RAC Opinion proposes any amendment of the current harmonised classification, the European Commission will prepare a delegated act, assisted by the expert group CARACAL (the Competent Authorities for the REACH and CLP Regulations), following which the Commission will submit the delegated act to the Council and the European Parliament before adoption.”
Tanto en Bayer como en Grifols voy a estar con el “ay” en el cuerpo hasta las mismas fechas aproximadamente (Grifols por CCA21… y Bayer porque tanto viajar el Supremo como via renovaciones caerá por fechas similares)
https://ec.europa.eu/food/system/files/2021-06/pesticides_aas_agg_report_202106.pdf (la chicha en la pag.6)
https://www.google.es/amp/s/www.agribusinessglobal.com/agrochemicals/herbicides/several-eu-members-reaffirm-glyphosate-safety/%3famp
https://cen.acs.org/environment/pesticides/Glyphosate-carcinogenic-EU-report-confirms/99/i24
No me parece menor el detalle que este informe a la luz de la información aportada por las empresas del lobby del glifosato sea elaborado por los enemigos del glifosato (con Francia a la cabeza)
“Overall conclusion of the assessment by the AGG
The AGG has compared the outcome of the evaluation with the criteria for approval, as provided in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009.
Based on the current assessment, the AGG considers that glyphosate does meet the approval criteria set in Regulation (EC) N° 1107/2009.
The AGG considers that authorisation in at least one Member State is expected to be possible for at least one plant protection product containing the active substance for at least one of the representative uses.
The AGG has also compared the outcome of the evaluation with the criteria for classification as provided in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on this comparison, AGG proposes that glyphosate fulfils the criteria for classification for Eye Damage Category 1 (H318) “causes serious eye damage” and Aquatic Chronic 2 (H411) “toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects”. This is the same as the present harmonised classification for glyphosate and no new classification is proposed.”
“Thereafter EFSA will organise a process of peer review among the experts of European Member States’ competent authorities. EFSA will then prepare a Conclusion, taking into account also the Opinion to be adopted by the ECHA Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) on classification. The EFSA Conclusion, foreseen for the second half of 2022, will be analysed by the European Commission which, based on the Conclusion, the dRAR and other factors legitimate to the matter, will prepare the discussion in the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed (SCoPAFF) in which risk managers of all Member States are represented20.
For the CLH-process, the Opinion of the Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) is foreseen to be adopted in March 2022, but this could be later in June if new data become available that the RAC is required to review and to include in the assessment. EFSA will take this into account before finalising its conclusion. In case the RAC Opinion proposes any amendment of the current harmonised classification, the European Commission will prepare a delegated act, assisted by the expert group CARACAL (the Competent Authorities for the REACH and CLP Regulations), following which the Commission will submit the delegated act to the Council and the European Parliament before adoption.”
Tanto en Bayer como en Grifols voy a estar con el “ay” en el cuerpo hasta las mismas fechas aproximadamente (Grifols por CCA21… y Bayer porque tanto viajar el Supremo como via renovaciones caerá por fechas similares)
