Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

And what if WMIH issued the 5MM preferred at $1000 each to generate $5B [Yes the preferred is a poison-pill] into WMIH. With a float of 200MM shares-out. That's $25.00 PPS [using the simple math with no discount for other factors, +/-].

Price/Book Ratio
http://www.investopedia.com/university/ratios/investment-valuation/ratio2.asp#axzz2K5YMMkzU

With WMIH's very low debt level, we could easily see a P/B of three [3]. Actually three is very low, try 5+.

$25.00 * 3 = $75.00 easy IMO.

P/B ratio of three is actually very low for a company like ours because we 'will' have NO debt, and large NOLs.
Plus ASSETS and funding, they are coming IMO?

We shall see.
The longer we wait, the sooner it will happen!

Too much emphasis on the NOLs as a selling point. We are set up as a baby BRK-B. $200mm capital with 0 debt that can be leveraged out 6x that. Plus the added NOLs. We could buy $10mm worth of Blackstone as a starting position if MW wanted. We can acquire value and grow it. If they want to buy out retail it has to be at a premium. $25 or we stay for the ride.

Simpson deja de postear cifras absurdas, que las acciones pueden valer 25 o 75 dólares.

Esto no es una broma, por tu irresponsable recomendación hay inversores perdiendo los calzoncillos en esta compra.

Es una burla para ellos que sigas posteando cifras sin sentido.

Empiezo a pensar que o no estas bien de la cabeza o es que tienes muy mala leche y pretendes crear una nueva red de pillados.

http://www.otcbb.com/asp/tradeact_mv.asp?SearchBy=issue&Issue=wmih&SortBy=volume&Month=1-1-2013

WMIH - WMI HOLDINGS January 2013
Total Share Volume 7,774,650

Issue preferred with voting rights attached to the default condition of dividends. This is the way to maintain 1123 (a) (6) restriction yet issue preferreds. These would be voting securities pursuant to certain default condition. For NOL ownership purpose, it is tricky nonetheless, IRS might be persuaded to consider these preferreds as non-voting as long as dividend default does not take place.

http://books.google.com/books?id=SnWKdQwD7zwC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=section+1123+(a)+(6)+issuing+preferred+shares&source=bl&ots=felEWpknf6&sig=uswCyE6thDaJs_yvedLnZ-_Eq4Q&hl=en&sa=X&ei=K90SUbW6ApTW8gTb3YHABA&ved=0CC0Q6AEwADgU#v=onepage&q=section%201123%20(a)%20(6)%20issuing%20preferred%20shares&f=false

Start at the bottom of page 12 and continue to page 13.

Weave this maneuver into, just for example, the possibility of buying GS reinsurance business.

Another angle to authorizing preferreds is linked to poison pill tactic, if that is the intended objective. If there is consensus among the parties, it probably would not be needed.

We cannot go private now by my understanding after having been a public company because it would constitute a real ownership-change and restrict the NOLs.

Our P/B Ratio could be very big due to the small share float. Why take a low ball offer like $25? The SNH [AAOC] can't take us private anyway or they restrict the value of the NOLs?
IMO, the going private is a No-Go story line.

From the example I stated; "Zimmer Holdings is left with a significantly reduced tangible shareholders' equity of $1,497.4. Factoring this amount into our equation, the company has a book value per share of only $6.04, and the price/book value ratio then skyrockets to 11.2 times."

When we have real news, things can go crazy. The market normally does IMO.

Animo Simpson para llegar 6`04 dólares no falta nada majete.

PREGUNTA del millón.
Sí sé vende las acciones de wmih, sé tiene derecho a los posibles futuros cobros de los SCROWS o por el contrario hay que tener las acciones actuales.?

Manzana hace poco te contesté a esa pregunta. Cuando escribo o me lees y prestas atencion o que pasa contigo?