Staging ::: VER CORREOS
Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
2.656 / 3.346
#21241

Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

http://www.kccllc.net/documents/0812229/0812229110711000000000039.pdf

"motion for an order shortening the notice and objection periods with respect to "debtors motion in limine to exclude portions of the experts reports and the testimony of the equity committees expert witnesses anders j. maxwell and kevin d. anderson""

page 5: "if the court declines to hear the motion to exclude at the confirmation hearing, the debtors would be irreparably prejudiced and their ability to move forward with a meaningful confirmation hearing would be jeopardized."

panic mode?

page 6:

"based on the foregoing, the debtors believe that cause exists for the motion to exclude to be heard on an expedited basis at the confirmation hearing, with objections beeing allowed up to and including the confirmation hearing"

what`s now, objections permitted, or objections allowed? and only objections against the motion to shorten, or objections against the motion to exclude, or both?
------------------------------------------------------------

The way I read it is that:
a) they want to exclude the last 2 EC's tax experts
b) they will accept objections to their objection up until tomorrow's court date
c) they want JMW to hear their objection to exclude the EC's last 2 tax experts to prevent the EC from admitting this evidence.

Must be some powerful stuff that the EC provided for use of the NOL's that Rosenturd is trying to exclude from being exposed. His reason for wanting to exclude this is that the EC figured it out too late and didn't meet the 14 day requirement for evidence prior to the start of trial.

How on earth is this sheet that Rosenturd says even allowed to be considered? It's mind boggling. It's like saying judge, we found the gun but that gun with matching fingerprints should not be allowed to be used as evidence because they found it too late? WTF kind of logic is this?

Again, if JMW excludes this portion of the EC testimony, it just shows another impropriety, which can be appealed, yet again.

#21242

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

Lo que me voy a reír cuando aprueben el por, tontolabas

#21243

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

Tu si que estas nervioso que estas soltando papel, ayer no vendiste mas porque tenias que malvenderlo, pájaro que te tenemos calado por mucho que desvies la atencion.

#21244

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

Que gilipollez decir que Rosen está
nervioso. No te Lo crees ni tú, eso te gustaría
No está nervioso ni Suman que sabe que sus pataletas sólo sirven para ampliar la agonía de los accionistas.
OS van a dejar sin un CHAVO.

#21245

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

Más te gustaría a ti soltar el papel que solte yo :)... os habeis juntado el hambre con las ganas de comer.

Menudo par de Campeones... os quiere saludar vuestro Jefe.

#21246

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

Escucha Sin un CHAVO... ¿te suena de algo? pues eso.
Que no vengas aquí a dar clases.

#21247

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

Que no engañes a más gente por favor pumper de las narices.

#21248

Re: Rosen está nervioso... Motion to exclude EC Experts

A estas alturas y con lo que ha recibido ya esta mas que retratado, para que compren mas incautos, el problema insisto lo tienen los pillados de marzo de 2010, cuando acabe toda esta parodia, que pasen a visitarlo por Sevilla a cantarle las cuarenta, eso siempre y cuando no haya cogido las de Villadiego, que es mas que probable dada la calaña de semejante cantamañanas.