Staging ::: VER CORREOS
Acceder

Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

26,5K respuestas
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
3 suscriptores
Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños
Página
1.777 / 3.346
#14209

Re: Las preferentes deberian subir tambien ya

Sí, yo ahora estoy al 95% Ps, 5% comunes, por si suena la flauta. La idea es apartar el capital invertido inicialmente y luego pasar alguna preferente a común...

Esperaba que las preferentes fueran las primeras en subir pero no ha sido así. A ver si empieza a salir algún dato bueno de assets y esto tira 'parriba.

#14210

Re: Las preferentes deberian subir tambien ya

El comentario sobre las Hs es cierto, estas que son las seguras a un cierto precio figuran infravaloradas.

#14211

Re: Las preferentes deberian subir tambien ya

Estos precios en aquellas fechas de febrero se comentaba: ÑAM -ÑAM BARATITAS BARATITAS.

#14212

Re: Las preferentes deberian subir tambien ya

Si, cuando acaben las vistas y hable la juez van a estar mas baratitas que nunca.

#14213

08/18/2010 EC v WMI Adversary Proceeding (Shareholder Meeting

http://www.ghostofwamu.com/documents/10-50731/10-50731-0054.pdf

It's good IMO. Page 13 para 6... (The parties shall use confidential info, including, without limitation, confidential discovery material, only for prosecution, defense or settlement of matters in the adversary proceedings).

Also, we know that there is confidential and highly confidential information being withheld from the public (including shareholders, the EC and other claimants (TPS, etc)). Now it appears the EC will be privy to it or at least some confidential information as long as they do NOT disclose it publically (we longs could care less since the EC is in the drivers seat and protecting our interests). The EC and estate have finally stipulated to a confidentiality agreement and a safeguard has been established to protect equity, relying on the courts to discretion. Now, it appears our EC will be privy to more confidential information not previously accessed.

Catz is absolutely right, our hats are hung on the EC's ability;)

Right, Catz.

This is not Rosen asking for something, but is a stipulation and agreement between WMI and the EC which serves the purposes of both sides. This is totally consistent with Susman's email to Weil early on offering confidentiality stipulations in order to expedite turnover of useful information in WMI's possession for objective analysis by Susman, without publishing it to all the other adversarial parties or the world. This allows Susman to do his job on this particular issue without opening up a can of worms regarding WMI's internal BOD issues, etc., that WMB bondholders or others might take advantage of. Moreover, it protects the privacy of EC internal deliberations and members' financial information that might have to be turned over in the context of the shareholder meeting dispute. So, I see it as a win-win situation, and standard operating procedure in this kind of situation

#14214

Re: 08/18/2010 EC v WMI Adversary Proceeding (Shareholder Meeting

Hoy se están comercializando volúmenes muy altos, que triplican o cuadruplican los promedios y diría que con tendencia leve al alza.
Con relación a los cortos según FINRA en el día de ayer se comercializaron:
20100818|WAMPQ|13842|15939|O
20100818|WAMUQ|6630264|18877323|O
Según Yahoo Finance ayer se comercializaron 31.100 de Ps y 19.129.100 de Qs. En el caso de las Qs más o menos cierra, pero en el de las Ps no. ¿Alguien conoce la explicación?
saludos

#14215

Re: Washington Mutual demanda a la FDIC por 17 billones US$ + daños

suben las teslas despues de los palos que se habian llevado